Reflections on Political Loyalty in Spain
A local piece reveals a troubling perspective on political loyalty and leadership in Spain, drawing attention to the idea of choosing leaders based on nepotism rather than merit.
In Joseph Conrad’s Lord Jim, a phrase resonates: “He was one of ours.” This reflects a sense of belonging to a moral community, not unlike how political parties operate today. However, the current system often prioritises loyalty over capability.
Political parties, such as the Canarian Coalition and the Port Authority of Las Palmas, exemplify this. The term “enchufado” (nepotism) has transformed; now, those referred to as “deserving” simply belong to the inner circle.
The Socialist Party has also seen a decline from its earlier ethical standards. Historically, figures like Fernando de los Ríos viewed socialism as a moral imperative. Today, the integrity of the party resembles a fractured shell of its former self.
The Popular Party has embraced familial ties, often appointing relatives in key positions. This “tribal” mentality suggests that those within similar backgrounds represent their constituents, regardless of actual capability.
As political entanglements deepen, questions arise about whether leaders truly serve the community or just their own interests. Recent rulings from Spain’s Supreme Court further complicate this narrative, indicating that loyalty to a leader’s inner circle has become intertwined with political identity.
Ultimately, many still see figures like Felipe González as part of their tribe—until they no longer do. This shifting loyalty underscores a worrying reality in Spanish politics, where relationships often supersede ethics and capability.
